LIABILITY OF ADVERTISING COMPANIES FOR CONSUMER LOSSES RESULTING FROM MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS

Main Article Content

Arina Hukmu Adila
Yuli Prasetyo Adhi

Abstract

Background. The increasing number of cases involving advertising installation companies that neglect safety standards has raised significant legal concerns, particularly regarding consumer protection. The background of this study lies in the unlawful acts committed by such companies, which often result in physical, material, or psychological harm to the public. This research aimed to determine the extent of the responsibility of advertising companies in committing unlawful acts and analyze the legal liability for unlawful acts by advertising companies that result in consumer harm.


Research Method. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and conceptual approach. Legal materials were sourced from primary legal norms, such as the Indonesian Civil Code, especially Article 1365 and supported by secondary sources, including academic literature and expert interpretations. The analysis was conducted qualitatively by classifying legal principles, doctrines, and case examples.


Findings. The findings indicate that unlawful acts, as defined in Article 1365 of the Civil Code, are interpreted broadly in Indonesia. These acts may include violations of others' rights, neglect of legal obligations, conduct contrary to public decency, and actions against societal norms of caution. Advertising companies that disregard structural safety, proper licensing, or installation procedures can be held civilly liable if their actions cause harm to others.


Conclusions. Advertising installation companies bear full legal responsibility for any consumer harm resulting from their unlawful conduct. To ensure accountability, stronger regulatory oversight and enforcement mechanisms are needed to protect the rights and safety of the public.

Article Details

How to Cite
Adila, A. H., & Adhi, Y. P. (2025). LIABILITY OF ADVERTISING COMPANIES FOR CONSUMER LOSSES RESULTING FROM MISLEADING ADVERTISEMENTS. EQUALEGUM International Law Journal, 3(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.61543/equ.v3i2.133
Section
Articles

References

Newman SA, Gopalkrishnan S. The prospect of digital human communication for organizational purposes. Front Commun 2023;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1200985.

Qomariah SN, Lidiyah UA. HUBUNGAN FAKTOR KOMUNIKASI DENGAN INSIDEN KESELAMATAN PASIEN (Correlation of Communication Factor with Patient Safety Incident). Journals Ners Community 2015;6.

Kocsis T, Kuslits B. Multidimensional labelling: Closing the sustainability information gap between producers, consumers and sustainability science in the food sector. Period Polytech Soc Manag Sci 2019;27. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.12594.

Moudzie ZP. Peranan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan dalam Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Obat Racikan Apotek Tanpa Resep Dokter. Jurist-Diction 2021;4. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v4i5.29835.

Hardi Nugraha Tunggele H. Etika Periklanan, Studi Kasus pada Iklan Grab Bike. CITRAWIRA J Advert Vis Commun 2022;3. https://doi.org/10.33153/citrawira.v3i2.4640.

Rukmana EN, Damayani NA, Yusup PM. KEGIATAN PELAYANAN PERPUSTAKAAN DI PERPUSTAKAAN BATU API (Studi Kasus Mengenai Proses Pelayanan Perpustakaan Dan Jenis Pelayanan Di Perpustakaan Batu Api). J Kaji Inf Dan Perpust 2015;3. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkip.v3i2.10000.

Anggelina RT. Analisis Pengaruh Periklanan Dan Promosi Penjualan Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian. Bus Enterpreneursh J 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.57084/bej.v2i2.771.

Wicaksono R, Nugroho AA, Agustanti RD. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Indihome Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. J Ilm Penegakan Huk 2021;8. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiph.v8i2.4793.

Inco Hary Perdana. Indonesian Advertising Ethics: Guard of Industry & Protector of Advertising Consumer in Indonesia (Study Case of the Role and Function of the Advertising Regulatory Agency on the 2020 Indonesian Advertising Ethics Amendment). Proc Int Conf Commun Sci 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.29303/iccsproceeding.v2i1.52.

Pranda CM. TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP IKLAN YANG MENYESATKAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DI INDONESIA HUKUM INTERNASIONAL TERKAIT. J Paradig Huk Pembang 2022;7. https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v7i2.3544.

Singh PP, Chahal HS. Consumers Attitude Towards Controversial Television Commercials and Its Impact on Purchase Intentions. Manag Labour Stud 2020;45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0258042X19890242.

Fitriana D. KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM ASPEK PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP INFORMASI KEAMANAN PRODUK DAN PENCANTUMAN LABEL KATEGORI PANGAN. J Jure Muhammadiyah Cirebon 2023;7. https://doi.org/10.32534/djmc.v7i1.4237.

Suyanto S. Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris Dan Gabungan. Unigres press; 2023.

Soemarwi VWS, Ridzkia Y. PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP PEREDARAN KOSMETIK PALSU BERDASARKAN UU NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DAN PERATURAN BPOM NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2019. J RECTUM Tinj Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana 2023;5. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.2864.

Muñoz CC. Notes on “Liability” for a Legal Act in Civil Law. Recognizing the Compensations for Sacrifice. Ius Prax 2021;27. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122021000200114.

Andra Yanto, Muhammad Syawir ARJD. POSITION OF THE PARTIES IN THE STANDARD AGREEMENT BANKING REVIEWED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION. Equal Int Law J 2023;1:176–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61543/equ.v1i3.50.

Farida N, Sofi M, S S. The Analysis of Word of Mouth (WOM) AND Brand Image on Purchasing Decisions. Divers Log J Multidiscip 2023;1:1–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61543/div.v1i1.16.

Risch M. Sue First, Negotiate Later. SSRN Electron J 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3140957.