NEUROLAW AND CHILD AGE LIMIT IN CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

Main Article Content

Damai Alan Saptama
Aime Renata Putri
Nobella Indradjaja
Chamdani Chamdani
Eileen Savage

Abstract

Background. Currently, research and reviews on the human brain are increasingly supported by continuously developing technological advancements. Thus, children's brain development is more easily comprehended along with the rapid growth of science. In criminal law, this supports the understanding of children's ability to control impulsive behavior. This research aimed to observe children's age limit in taking responsibility for crimes in the Indonesian law system by considering legal theories and science related to the cognitive neural system from the perspective of neurolaw.


Research Method. In this research, the data is obtained from a literature study and analyzed conceptually based on legal regulation in Indonesia usually it’s namely normative legal research.


Findings. The result of this research showed that in Indonesia, children can be imposed with criminal responsibility from the age of 12 until before they reach the age of 18. Meanwhile, from the perspective of neurolaw, the brain has not completely developed within that age range, and its shifts are reflected in human behavior. However, due to the gradual transition of brain development, it is impossible to determine an absolute age limit for brain maturity in the range of 12-17 years old, and thus children’s criminal cases must be reviewed individually. Therefore, the assistance or explanation of neural/psychiatric experts, besides legal experts, is required in handling children's criminal cases.


Conclusion. Children can be charged with criminal responsibility from 12 to 18 years old, due to brain development shifts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saptama, D. A., Putri, A. R., Indradjaja, N., Chamdani, C., & Savage, E. (2024). NEUROLAW AND CHILD AGE LIMIT IN CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY. EQUALEGUM International Law Journal, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.61543/equ.v2i2.69
Section
Articles

References

Lewoleba, Kayus Kayowuan, dan Mulyadi. “Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Keadilan Restoratif.” Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam 11, no. 2 (November 2023): 143–61. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v11i02.5070.

Sitepu, Rida Ista. “Peninjauan Kembali Batas Usia Minimum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak yang Terlibat Perdagangan Narkotika.” JURNAL RECHTEN: RISET HUKUM DAN HAK ASASI MANUSIA 2, no. 3 (Agustus 2022): 39–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v2i3.90.

Consortium for Street Children. “Brunei.” Consortium for Street Children, Juni 2022. https://www.streetchildren.org/legal-atlas/map/brunei/status-offences/is-it-illegal-for-children-to-beg.

Nousheen, Sadika. “Minimum age of criminal responsibility: A Quandary.” The Daily Star, 8 September 2023. https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/news/minimum-age-criminal-responsibility-quandary-3413696.

UNICEF Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia. “Guidance Note – Children under the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility – ECARO1 © UNICEF/UN041329/PIROZZI Systematic Responses to Children under the Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility who have been (Allegedly) Involved in Offending Behaviour in Europe and Central Asia,” December 2022. https://www.unicef.org/eca/reports/systematic-responses-children-under-minimum-age-criminal-responsibility.

] Cashmore, Judy. “5 reasons why the age of criminal responsibility should be raised.” The University of Sydney - News & Opinion, 28 Juli 2020. https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2020/07/28/why-the-age-of-criminal-responsibility-should-be-raised.html.

Nabilla, Shintya, dan David Desmon. “Pengaruh Lingkungan Terhadap Perkembangan Anak.” Jurnal Ilmiah Zona Psikologi 4, no. 3 (Juni 2022): 66–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37776/jizp.v4i3.

Saepurohman, Muthi’ah Jihadillah, Najmu Hawa, dan Debie Susanti. “Dampak Stres dalam Perkembangan Otak Anak.” Incrementapedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 4, no. 1 (Juni 2022): 54–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36456/incrementapedia.vol4.no1.a6876

Kabir, Syahrul Fauzul. “Kejahatan dan Hukuman Tantangan Filosofis Determinisme-Kausal terhadap Pertanggungjawaban.” Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 49, no. 2 (7 Januari 2019): 279–98. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2003.

Zhou, Yi, Hongjun Song, dan Guo-li Ming. “Genetics of human brain development.” Nature Review Genetics 25 (January 2024): 26–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-023-00626-5.

Prema, I Ketut Arjuna Satya, Masruchin Ruba’i, dan Nurini Aprilianda. “Pembatasan Usia Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 4, no. 2 (2019): 232–41. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v4i2p232-241.

Petoft, Arian. “Neurolaw: A brief introduction.” Iranian Journal of Neurology 14, no. 1 (5 January 2015): 53–58. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4395810/pdf/IJNL-14-53.pdf.

Taylor, J. Sherrod, J. Anderson Harp, dan Tyron Elliott. “Neuropsychologists and neurolawyers.” Neuropsychology 5, no. 4 (Oktober 1991): 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.5.4.293.

Mangkudilaga, Bia. “Kedudukan Keterangan Ahli dalam Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana oleh Pelaku yang Mengalami Skizofrenia Paranoid.” Lex LATA Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 4, no. 2 (Februari 2022): 156–70. http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/LexS/article/view/1549/584.

Baptist Health. “MRI vs. fMRI: What Are the Differences?” BaptistHealth.com, 25 September 2018. https://www.baptisthealth.com/blog/baptist-health/mri-vs-fmri-what-are-the-differences.

Fernando, Zico Junius, Rosmanila, Laily Ratna, Achmad Cholidin, dan Bhanu Prakash Nunna. “The Role of Neuroprediction and Artificial Intelligence in the Future of Criminal Procedure Support Science: A New Era in Neuroscience and Criminal Justice.” Yuridika 38, no. 3 (1 September 2023): 593–620. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i3.46104.

Aono, Darby, Gideon Yaffe, dan Hedy Kober. “Neuroscientific evidence in the courtroom: a review.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 4, no. 1 (22 December 2019): 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0179-y.

Petoft, Arian, Mahmoud Abbasi, dan Alireza Zali. “Toward children’s cognitive development from the perspective of neurolaw: implications of Roper v. Simmons.” Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 30, no. 2 (4 Maret 2023): 144–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.2003267.

Gogtay, Nitin, Jay N. Giedd, Leslie Lusk, Kiralee M. Hayashi, Deanna Greenstein, A. Catherine Vaituzis, Tom F. Nugent, dkk. “Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, no. 21 (25 Mei 2004): 8174–79. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402680101.

Benekos, Peter J., dan Alida V. Merlo. “A Decade of Change: Roper v. Simmons, Defending Childhood, and Juvenile Justice Policy.” Criminal Justice Policy Review 30, no. 1 (24 February 2019): 102–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416648734.

Jones, David T., dan Jonathan Graff-Radford. “Executive Dysfunction and the Prefrontal Cortex.” CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learning in Neurology 27, no. 6 (December 2021): 1586–1601. https://doi.org/10.1212/CON.0000000000001009.

Arain, Mariam, Maliha Haque, Lina Johal, Mathur Puja, Wynand Nel, Afsha Rais, Ranbir Sandhu, dan Sushil Sharma. “Maturation of the adolescent brain.” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 9 (2 April 2013): 449. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S39776.

Uytun, Merve Cikili. “Development Period of Prefrontal Cortex.” Dalam Prefrontal Cortex, disunting oleh Ana Starcevic dan Branislav Filipovic. InTech, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.78697.

Adleman, Nancy E., Vinod Menon, Christine M. Blasey, Christopher D. White, Ilana S. Warsofsky, Gary H. Glover, dan Allan L. Reiss. “A Developmental fMRI Study of the Stroop Color-Word Task.” NeuroImage 16, no. 1 (Mei 2002): 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1046.

Suyanto S, Qomariah SN, Syaiful Y, Fatmawati L. LEGAL CASE AND HEALTH PERSPECTIVE OF BULLYING LEADING TO BLINDNESS. EQUALEGUM International Law Journal. 2023 May 30:143-7.

Malagano T, Dainty AR. ANALYSIS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF DIVERSION AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AS A FORM OF PROTECTION OF CHILDREN'S RIGHTS IN CONFLICT WITH THE LAW. EQUALEGUM International Law Journal. 2024 Jan 29:15-22.

Manuputty A, Tudor ME. APPLICATION OF THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION IN CHILDREN'S CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS TO PRISONERS. EQUALEGUM International Law Journal. 2024 Jan 29:23-8.

Pradana HK, Chasanah N, Savage E. A REVIEW OF CHILDREN'S ILLEGAL RACING BASED ON LAW NO. 22 OF 2009 CONCERNING ROAD TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION. EQUALEGUM International Law Journal. 2023 Sep 30:155-60.

Utami RB, Ula SN, Suroso H, Ekwantoro E, Paraswati MD. THE USE OF GADGETS WITH THE PSYCHOSOCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF PRESCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN. SYNTHESIS Global Health Journal. 2023 Dec 10:73-9.

Qomariah SN, Amin NS, Azizah YN, Huda M. Stress Management Education and Training Program Reduces The Anxiety Levels Of Students Facing The National High School Exam. Synthesis Global Health Journal. 2023 Mar 23:1-9.

QOMARIAH, Siti Nur; SETIAWAN, Budi. Perilaku ibu dalam penatalaksanaan diare mencegah dehidrasi anak. Journals of Ners Community Volume, 2015, 6.1.

RUKMINI, Rukmini, et al. Assessing patient safety implementation and its associate factors in a pediatric inpatient ward. Universa Medicina, 2024, 43.1: 4-12.

QOMARIAH, Siti Nur, et al. TERAPI BERMAIN: BONEKA TANGAN TERHADAP RESPONS ADAPTIF ANAK PRA SEKOLAH. Journals of Ners Community, 2014, 5.2: 114-117.

QOMARIAH, Siti Nur; ISWATI, Iswati; BAKAR, Abu. Penerapan Kebijakan Keselamatan Pasien Rawat Inap Kasus Medikal Bedah. PROSIDING KONFERENSI NASIONAL ILMU KESEHATAN STIKES ADI HUSADA 2023, 2023, 1.1: 77-83.

Mercurio, Ezequiel, Eric García-López, Luz Anyela Morales-Quintero, Nicolás E. Llamas, José Ángel Marinaro, dan José M. Muñoz. “Adolescent Brain Development and Progressive Legal Responsibility in the Latin American Context.” Frontiers in Psychology 11, no. 627 (24 April 2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00627.