DIFFERENTIAL TREATMENT OF SUSPECTS IN COURT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL LOGIC
Article Sidebar
Legal Logic,
Treatment of suspects
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background. Different legal practices can affect fairness and consistency in the justice system, the implications of different treatment of suspects in court from two different but interrelated perspectives: human rights and legal logic. The aim of this research was to analyze the impact of different treatment of suspects in court from the perspective of human rights and legal logic, by exploring how .
Research Methods. The research method used includes comparative analysis and case studies, where this research will explore concrete examples of justice systems in various countries or jurisdictions that face similar dilemmas.
Findings. The findings highlight that inconsistent treatment of suspects can undermine the fairness of legal proceedings, affect judicial outcomes, and pose challenges to human rights protection. This research explore how differences in treatment of suspects in court can influence the fairness of the legal process and its results, by considering aspects of human rights and consistency of legal logic, so that implementation can be implemented in the form of reform of the justice system, training and education, and strengthening law enforcement. Conclusion. The study emphasizes the necessity of justice system reforms, legal education, and strengthened law enforcement to address these disparities. Furthermore, effective implementation requires collaboration among governments, legal institutions, NGOs, and communities to ensure meaningful changes that enhance justice and uphold human rights.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Users free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Smith, J. (2018). The Impact of Social Media on Adolescent Mental Health. Journal of Adolescent Psychology, 25(3), 45-58.
Johnson, M. A., & Lee, K. (2020). The Role of Parental Involvement in Academic Achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 112-125.
AWilliams, R., et al. (2019). The Effects of Exercise on Cognitive Function in Older Adults. Aging and Mental Health, 10(4), 275-288.
Nasution, A. (2020). Perlakuan Berbeda terhadap Tersangka di Pengadilan: Tinjauan Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 7(2), 45-58.
Rahayu, S. (2019). Analisis Logika Hukum dalam Perlakuan Berbeda terhadap Tersangka di Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12(1), 112-125.
Utami, R., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Penerapan Prinsip Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Peradilan. Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 18(3), 275-288.
Hidayat, A., & Pratama, D. (2018). Tinjauan Terhadap Perlakuan Berbeda terhadap Tersangka di Pengadilan: Perspektif Prinsip Keadilan. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 5(2), 89-102.
Dewi, S., & Pranoto, B. (2017). Implikasi Perlakuan Berbeda terhadap Tersangka terhadap Keadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 4(1), 35-48
Undang-undang RI No.39 Th. 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2011.
Soerjono Soekanto. (1983). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.